| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 7 | |
| 1. |  | BONATTI, M.; BAYER, S.; POPE, K.; EUFEMIA, L.; TURETTA, A. P. D.; TREMBLAY, C.; SIEBER, S. Assessing the effectiveness and justice of protected areas governance: issues and situated pathways to environmental policies in Río Negro National Park, Paraguay. Social Sciences, v. 12, n. 2, 71, 2023.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Solos. |
|    |
| 3. | | YAZDANPANAH, M.; MOGHADAM, M. T.; ZOBEIDI, T.; TURETTA, A. P. D.; EUFEMIA, L.; SIEBER, S. What factors contribute to conversion to organic farming? Consideration of the Health Belief Model in relation to the uptake of organic farming by Iranian farmers. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, v. 65, n. 5, p. 907-929, 2022.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Solos. |
|  |
| 4. | | DA PONTE, E.; ALCASENA, F.; BHAGWAT, T.; HU, Z.; EUFEMIA, L.; TURETTA, A. P. D.; BONATTI, M.; BARR, P.-L. Assessing wildfire activity and forest loss in protected areas of the Amazon basin. Applied Geography, v. 157, 102970, Aug. 2023.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Solos. |
| |
| 5. | | BONATTI, M.; ERISMANN, C.; ASKHABALIEVA, A.; BORBA, J.; POPE, K.; REYNALDO, R.; EUFEMIA, L.; TURETTA, A. P. D.; SIEBER, S. Social learning as an underlying mechanism for sustainability in neglected communities: the Brazilian case of the Bucket Revolution project. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2022. On-line first.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Solos. |
| |
| 7. | | LÖHR, K.; MUGABE, P.; TURETTA, A. P. D.; STEINKE, J.; LOZANO, C.; BONATTI, M.; EUFEMIA, L.; ITO, L. H.; KONZACK, A.; KROLL, S.; MGENI, C. P.; RAMANANK' ANDRASANA, D.; TADESSE, S.; YAZDANPANAH, M.; SIEBER, S. Assessing impacts of COVID-19 and their responses among smallholder farmers in Brazil, Madagascar and Tanzania. Outlook on Agriculture, v. 51, n. 4, p. 460-469, Dec. 2022.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Solos. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 7 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Solos. |
|
Data corrente: |
18/04/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
10/08/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
EUFEMIA, L.; TURETTA, A. P. D.; BONATTI, M.; DA PONTE, E.; SIEBER, S. |
|
Afiliação: |
LUCA EUFEMIA, HUMBOLDT- UNIVERSITÄT ZU BERLIN; ANA PAULA DIAS TURETTA, CNPS; MICHELLE BONATTI, HUMBOLDT- UNIVERSITÄT ZU BERLIN; EMMANUEL DA PONTE, GERMAN AEROSPACE CENTER; STEFAN SIEBER, HUMBOLDT- UNIVERSITÄT ZU BERLIN. |
|
Título: |
Fires in the Amazon region: quick policy review. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Development Policy Review, v. 40, n. 5, e12620, 2022. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12620 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Motivation: The combination of institutional weaknesses, climate change, and overexploitation is increasingly recognized as endangering the Amazon forest. These three factors made 2020 the worst year for forest fires recorded in the previous 60 years. We analyse environmental policies across the nine countries of the Amazon Basin to develop national and regional forest programmes to tackle this scenario. Purpose: The study synthesizes and compares key environmental legislation concerning protected natural areas (PNAs) and fire management in the nine countries of the Amazon Basin. To this end, the research question asks what directions can be drawn from a visualization and compilation of national regulations for future policy research and practice. Methods and approach: We undertake a critical literature review of PNAs and fire-management policies across the nine countries of the Amazon Basin and their further alignment using analyses of previous policy reviews on forest codes and land distribution. Findings: The article shows the heterogeneity of national fire-use and fire-management policies among the nine countries of the Amazon Basin. In addition, it suggests that top-down policies and regulations are likely to be characterized by misunderstandings (either direct or indirect) of local practice, rationale, and capacity; and, in some cases, risk criminalizing local and indigenous daily subsistence. Policy implications: The study indicates the need for more in-depth research and policy on participatory governance platforms for the use and management of fire, rather than fire-suppression and fire-risk adaptation strategies. There are some positive, albeit often isolated, cases, to which scholars, policy-makers, and environmental practitioners should pay more attention. MenosMotivation: The combination of institutional weaknesses, climate change, and overexploitation is increasingly recognized as endangering the Amazon forest. These three factors made 2020 the worst year for forest fires recorded in the previous 60 years. We analyse environmental policies across the nine countries of the Amazon Basin to develop national and regional forest programmes to tackle this scenario. Purpose: The study synthesizes and compares key environmental legislation concerning protected natural areas (PNAs) and fire management in the nine countries of the Amazon Basin. To this end, the research question asks what directions can be drawn from a visualization and compilation of national regulations for future policy research and practice. Methods and approach: We undertake a critical literature review of PNAs and fire-management policies across the nine countries of the Amazon Basin and their further alignment using analyses of previous policy reviews on forest codes and land distribution. Findings: The article shows the heterogeneity of national fire-use and fire-management policies among the nine countries of the Amazon Basin. In addition, it suggests that top-down policies and regulations are likely to be characterized by misunderstandings (either direct or indirect) of local practice, rationale, and capacity; and, in some cases, risk criminalizing local and indigenous daily subsistence. Policy implications: The study indicates the need for more in-depth research... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Bacia Amazônica. |
|
Thesagro: |
Incêndio Florestal; Política Florestal; Uso da Terra. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Forest fire management; Forest policy; Land policy; Wildfires. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/238236/1/Fires-in-the-Amazon-Region-2022.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02574naa a2200277 a 4500
001 2142246
005 2022-08-10
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12620$2DOI
100 1 $aEUFEMIA, L.
245 $aFires in the Amazon region$bquick policy review.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
520 $aMotivation: The combination of institutional weaknesses, climate change, and overexploitation is increasingly recognized as endangering the Amazon forest. These three factors made 2020 the worst year for forest fires recorded in the previous 60 years. We analyse environmental policies across the nine countries of the Amazon Basin to develop national and regional forest programmes to tackle this scenario. Purpose: The study synthesizes and compares key environmental legislation concerning protected natural areas (PNAs) and fire management in the nine countries of the Amazon Basin. To this end, the research question asks what directions can be drawn from a visualization and compilation of national regulations for future policy research and practice. Methods and approach: We undertake a critical literature review of PNAs and fire-management policies across the nine countries of the Amazon Basin and their further alignment using analyses of previous policy reviews on forest codes and land distribution. Findings: The article shows the heterogeneity of national fire-use and fire-management policies among the nine countries of the Amazon Basin. In addition, it suggests that top-down policies and regulations are likely to be characterized by misunderstandings (either direct or indirect) of local practice, rationale, and capacity; and, in some cases, risk criminalizing local and indigenous daily subsistence. Policy implications: The study indicates the need for more in-depth research and policy on participatory governance platforms for the use and management of fire, rather than fire-suppression and fire-risk adaptation strategies. There are some positive, albeit often isolated, cases, to which scholars, policy-makers, and environmental practitioners should pay more attention.
650 $aForest fire management
650 $aForest policy
650 $aLand policy
650 $aWildfires
650 $aIncêndio Florestal
650 $aPolítica Florestal
650 $aUso da Terra
653 $aBacia Amazônica
700 1 $aTURETTA, A. P. D.
700 1 $aBONATTI, M.
700 1 $aDA PONTE, E.
700 1 $aSIEBER, S.
773 $tDevelopment Policy Review$gv. 40, n. 5, e12620, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Solos (CNPS) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
